Thứ Năm, 23 tháng 2, 2012

The Lede Blog: Virginia Lawmakers Vote on Modified Ultrasound Bill

5:20 p.m. | Updated Republican lawmakers in Virginia voted today on a controversial bill that would force a woman to get an ultrasound before having an abortion and require doctors to ask whether she wants to hear the fetal heartbeat and obtain a printed image of the fetus.

The original bill, which drew a protest of almost 1,000 people to the state Capitol in Richmond on Monday, was amended by Republican legislative leaders working with Republican Governor Bob McDonnell after it drew intense national attention.

The changes, outlined in this article by my colleague Sabrina Tavernise, included no longer requiring women to have a specific type of pelvic ultrasound before the abortion, known as a transvaginal ultrasound. The changes also included having the doctor ask the woman if she wants to see an image from the ultrasound rather than requiring the doctor to attach a copy of the image to the woman’s medical file.

The bill was approved 65 to 32 in the Republican-led House of Delegates. The original measure was approved by the Senate earlier this month.

Mr. McDonnell said he would sign this modified bill.

“I am pro-life,” Mr. McDonnell said in a statement prior to the vote that outlined the series of amendments that were negotiated on Tuesday night and earlier today with Republican leaders. “I believe deeply in the sanctity of innocent human life and believe governments have a duty to protect human life. The more our society embraces a culture of life for all people, the better country we will have.”

The bill, requiring an ultrasound 24 hours prior to an abortion, was denounced by opponents who said it interfered with the private relationship between doctors and patients.

“The Legislature should not be playing doctor,” said Tarina Keene, executive director of Naral Pro-Choice Virginia. “This is a decision that should be made by a medical professional and offered to a woman. That means those two people should be making the decision, and not the government. It should not be mandated.”

The bill is the latest skirmish in a battle over abortion, contraception and the role of government in women’s health care issues that has been waging online and across the cable television in recent weeks.

The issue of contraception and abortion is also emerging as a hot issue in the 2012 Republican presidential race with Rick Santorum fueling the debate with his remarks on pre-natal testing. Mr. Santorum said he opposed free screenings for birth defects under President Obama’s health care law because they would encourage more women to have abortions, which would “cull the ranks of the disabled in our society.”

In Virginia, some of the same voices on both sides of the uproar over the Susan G. Komen foundation’s decision to cut Planned Parenthood funds and the move by Catholic bishops to block insurance coverage for contraception have been weighing in on this measure.

Anti-abortion advocates believe the rule will persuade some women to change their minds on abortion, while supporters of abortion rights say that such state requirements interfere with a woman’s privacy and with decisions that should be between a medical professional and a patient.

The legislation prompted Jon Stewart to make fun of Virginia’s lawmaker on the Comedy Central’s “Daily Show” Tuesday night. And the national conversation over contraception became fodder for NBC’s “Saturday Night Live”, with Amy Poehler and Seth Meyers focusing on a panel of five men invited to discuss birth control at a House Republican hearing.

Earlier on Wednesday, four organizations, including Planned Parenthood and Naral Pro-Choice America, presented petitions with 30,000 signatures of people who oppose the bill.

On the other side, supporters of the bill from the Family Foundation were using their Facebook page to urge people to contact their lawmakers and vote in favor of the legislation.

After the posted Mr. McDonnell’s statement on the ultrasound bill, detailing the amendments, some people commented on the Family Foundation’s Facebook page, saying that they thought the changes were reasonable enough. Another person said “McDonnell is more concerned about being Mitt Romney’s running mate than he is about unborn children’s lives,” referring to speculation that Mr. McDonnell backed away from the bill to make him a more politically attractive prospect as a vice presidential running mate.


View the original article here